The graffito are all very different from one another, but they are all connected by commonalities in their history, style, and intent. 

Some graffiti is considered street art, some is legal, some is vandalism, but should all illegal graffiti be classified as vandalism? Is there a difference between pure vandalism and graffiti? 

To emphasise the similarities between the various graffito, the picture capture was purposely made in black and white. 

In order to address the issue "should all unlawful graffito be called vandalism or is there a boundary between pure vandalism and graffito," the images are so starkly contrasted that it is almost impossible to tell apart legal from illegal graffito.